Insurance SEO Keywords: Real Data by Line and Intent
Insurance SEO keywords are a low-volume, high-value market: of 79 agent-marketing terms we measured through DataForSEO Labs in July 2026, only four clear 1,000 searches a month, CPCs run from $9 to $220 a click, and 60 of 79 are too small for a difficulty score — which is precisely what makes them winnable for a single agency.
Every published list of insurance SEO keywords is the same recycled guesswork — no volumes, no costs, no difficulty scores, just “target ‘life insurance quotes’!” advice that would incinerate an agent’s budget. This page is the opposite: a measured dataset you can plan against.
In July 2026 we pulled 79 agent- and agency-marketing keywords through DataForSEO Labs (US, English). The headline findings: only four terms clear 1,000 searches a month, click costs run from $9.12 to $220.01, and 60 of the 79 keywords are too small for DataForSEO to score difficulty at all. Insurance search is a low-volume, high-value market — you win it on intent and coverage, not raw traffic. Every table below cites the pull it came from, and nothing is estimated or invented.
How to read this data
Four things to know before you use the tables:
- Volume is average monthly US searches. Insurance volumes look tiny next to other industries; the commissions behind each search are why the clicks still cost what they do.
- CPC is what Google Ads advertisers pay per click. A “—” means too few advertisers bid on the term for a measured CPC to exist. For paid-channel context by product line, see our breakdown of insurance PPC cost per click.
- Difficulty (KD) is DataForSEO’s 0–100 competitiveness score. “n/a — not measurable” means the term had too little ranking data to score — usually a low-competition signal, but never treat it as a zero.
- Intent is DataForSEO’s classification: informational, commercial, transactional, or navigational.
Only 19 of the 79 keywords returned a measurable difficulty score, and 8 returned no measurable volume at all. That is the defining trait of this vertical: most of the demand lives below the measurement floor.
What are the most searched insurance keywords?
The most searched agent-facing insurance keywords are lead terms: “insurance leads” and “life insurance leads” tie at 1,900 monthly searches, with “insurance leads for agents” and “final expense leads” at 1,300 each (DataForSEO Labs, July 2026). But all four are navigational or top-of-funnel — searchers hunting lead vendors, not hiring a local agent — so the highest-volume terms are the worst client-acquisition targets in the entire dataset.
The terms that actually produce business for an agency sit an order of magnitude lower, in the commercial columns of the tables below.
Agency and marketing keywords
What agents and agency principals type when they’re looking for marketing help — the buying-intent core of this dataset.
| Keyword | Volume/mo | CPC | Difficulty | Intent |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| seo for insurance agents | 720 | $58.37 | n/a — not measurable | commercial |
| insurance seo company | 390 | — | n/a — not measurable | commercial |
| recruiting for insurance agents | 210 | $43.11 | n/a — not measurable | informational |
| insurance agency marketing services | 210 | $17.19 | 17 | commercial |
| digital marketing for insurance agents | 140 | $26.17 | n/a — not measurable | commercial |
| marketing to insurance agents | 140 | $15.82 | n/a — not measurable | commercial |
| insurance marketing agency | 110 | $42.65 | 4 | commercial |
| insurance marketing ideas | 110 | $9.12 | 3 | commercial |
| local seo for insurance agents | 110 | — | n/a — not measurable | commercial |
| social media marketing for insurance agents | 110 | $20.69 | n/a — not measurable | informational |
| marketing strategies for insurance agents | 90 | $40.45 | n/a — not measurable | informational |
| insurance agent marketing ideas | 90 | $31.43 | n/a — not measurable | commercial |
| insurance agency marketing strategy | 90 | $40.45 | n/a — not measurable | commercial |
| telemarketing for insurance agents | 90 | $36.69 | n/a — not measurable | commercial |
| marketing consultant insurance | 70 | $220.01 | n/a — not measurable | commercial |
| facebook ads for insurance agents | 70 | $20.30 | n/a — not measurable | informational |
| email marketing for insurance agents | 50 | $50.70 | n/a — not measurable | commercial |
| google ads for insurance agents | 30 | $21.11 | n/a — not measurable | commercial |
| content marketing for insurance agents | 20 | — | n/a — not measurable | commercial |
| digital marketing agency for insurance | 10 | $52.10 | n/a — not measurable | commercial |
Source: DataForSEO Labs, July 2026 (US, English).
Two things stand out. “Marketing consultant insurance” is the most expensive click in the entire pull at $220.01 — seventy monthly searches, each one a business owner ready to write a retainer check. And the two scored head terms — “insurance marketing agency” at KD 4 and “insurance marketing ideas” at KD 3 — are among the softest commercial targets we have ever measured in any vertical.
Lead generation keywords
The volume center of insurance search. Note how much of it is navigational — people looking for a lead vendor by category, not an agent.
| Keyword | Volume/mo | CPC | Difficulty | Intent |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| insurance leads | 1,900 | $25.72 | n/a — not measurable | navigational |
| insurance leads for agents | 1,300 | $37.28 | n/a — not measurable | informational |
| insurance leads generation | 720 | $29.55 | n/a — not measurable | navigational |
| telemarketing insurance leads | 590 | — | n/a — not measurable | commercial |
| insurance telemarketing leads | 590 | — | n/a — not measurable | commercial |
| leads for insurance agents | 390 | $32.70 | 14 | informational |
| exclusive insurance leads | 390 | $17.18 | n/a — not measurable | navigational |
| health insurance leads | 320 | $30.22 | n/a — not measurable | informational |
| insurance leads companies | 260 | $38.35 | n/a — not measurable | informational |
| insurance lead generation companies | 260 | $38.35 | 1 | informational |
| insurance leads providers | 170 | $47.50 | n/a — not measurable | navigational |
| buy insurance leads | 140 | $36.14 | 3 | transactional |
| how to generate insurance leads | 110 | $20.18 | n/a — not measurable | informational |
| how to get insurance clients | 30 | $24.71 | n/a — not measurable | informational |
Source: DataForSEO Labs, July 2026 (US, English).
The single best gap in the dataset lives here: “insurance lead generation companies” — 260 searches a month, a $38.35 CPC, and a keyword difficulty of 1, with a 12-month trend of +177% in the same pull. “Buy insurance leads” at KD 3 is the transactional twin.
Life insurance keywords
| Keyword | Volume/mo | CPC | Difficulty | Intent |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| life insurance leads | 1,900 | $18.18 | n/a — not measurable | navigational |
| life insurance leads live transfer | 210 | $15.10 | n/a — not measurable | transactional |
| life insurance leads for agents | 210 | $26.33 | n/a — not measurable | informational |
| how to get life insurance leads | 170 | $23.45 | n/a — not measurable | informational |
Source: DataForSEO Labs, July 2026 (US, English).
“Life insurance leads for agents” carries a +88% 12-month trend in this pull — one of the few core terms growing rather than shrinking. Live-transfer is the one measured transactional term in the line.
Medicare keywords
Medicare search is seasonal — AEP compresses a year of demand into ten weeks — and most of its long tail sits below the measurement floor.
| Keyword | Volume/mo | CPC | Difficulty | Intent |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| turning 65 medicare leads | 140 | $31.74 | n/a — not measurable | informational |
| medicare leads for agents | 70 | $41.60 | n/a — not measurable | informational |
| medicare supplement marketing | 10 | $24.30 | n/a — not measurable | informational |
| medicare supplement leads for agents | 10 | — | 17 | informational |
| medicare aep marketing | 10 | — | n/a — not measurable | informational |
Source: DataForSEO Labs, July 2026 (US, English).
Final expense keywords
| Keyword | Volume/mo | CPC | Difficulty | Intent |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| final expense leads | 1,300 | $14.28 | n/a — not measurable | informational |
| final expense direct mail leads | 90 | $27.11 | n/a — not measurable | transactional |
| aged final expense leads | 70 | $10.78 | n/a — not measurable | informational |
| final expense facebook ads | 70 | $12.29 | n/a — not measurable | commercial |
| exclusive final expense leads | 40 | $15.94 | n/a — not measurable | navigational |
| final expense telemarketing leads | 10 | $15.56 | n/a — not measurable | informational |
| how to sell final expense over the phone | 10 | — | 21 | informational |
Source: DataForSEO Labs, July 2026 (US, English).
Final expense is the rare line with rising channel terms: “final expense direct mail leads” trends +57% and “final expense facebook ads” +29% over 12 months in this pull, while most of the industry’s keywords decline.
P&C, auto, and home keywords
Tiny measured volumes — but this is the segment where difficulty scores actually exist, which tells you real sites are competing for real money.
| Keyword | Volume/mo | CPC | Difficulty | Intent |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| cross selling in insurance | 110 | — | n/a — not measurable | informational |
| property and casualty insurance leads | 10 | $72.30 | 13 | navigational |
| property and casualty insurance marketing | 10 | — | 21 | commercial |
| home insurance leads for agents | 10 | $32.13 | 12 | informational |
| auto insurance marketing ideas | 10 | — | 45 | commercial |
| account rounding insurance | 10 | — | n/a — not measurable | informational |
Source: DataForSEO Labs, July 2026 (US, English).
A $72.30 CPC on ten monthly searches (“property and casualty insurance leads”) is this vertical in one row: almost nobody searches it, and the few who do are worth fighting over. “Home insurance leads for agents” also posts a +100% 12-month trend.
Annuity, IUL, and mortgage protection keywords
| Keyword | Volume/mo | CPC | Difficulty | Intent |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| annuity leads for agents | 50 | $32.45 | n/a — not measurable | informational |
| exclusive annuity leads | 20 | $26.75 | n/a — not measurable | navigational |
| annuity marketing ideas | 10 | — | n/a — not measurable | informational |
| how to market annuities | 10 | — | n/a — not measurable | informational |
| exclusive mortgage protection leads | 10 | $18.03 | 24 | informational |
Source: DataForSEO Labs, July 2026 (US, English).
The trend split is stark: “annuity leads for agents” is down 94% over 12 months in this pull — the steepest decline in the dataset — while “exclusive mortgage protection leads” is up 100%. Annuity demand hasn’t vanished; it has moved to AI assistants and advisor referrals, which changes where you publish, not whether you do.
Website, CRM, and software keywords
The biggest cluster of untapped commercial volume in the dataset — agents shopping for tools, not marketing.
| Keyword | Volume/mo | CPC | Difficulty | Intent |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| crm for insurance agents | 590 | $59.58 | 11 | commercial |
| software for insurance agents | 480 | $31.99 | n/a — not measurable | commercial |
| best crm for insurance agents | 260 | $41.90 | 14 | commercial |
| insurance agent website | 210 | $22.02 | 56 | navigational |
| website design for insurance agents | 170 | $45.14 | 23 | commercial |
| insurance agent crm software | 170 | $63.25 | 32 | commercial |
| crm software for insurance agents | 170 | $63.25 | 12 | commercial |
| salesforce for insurance agents | 110 | $28.48 | n/a — not measurable | informational |
| zoho crm for insurance agents | 90 | $20.87 | n/a — not measurable | navigational |
| clickfunnels for insurance agents | 10 | — | n/a — not measurable | commercial |
Source: DataForSEO Labs, July 2026 (US, English).
The three core CRM terms alone combine for over 1,300 monthly searches at difficulty scores of 11–14 and CPCs of $32–$60 — the reason we published a full CRM comparison for insurance agents. Note the one hard term in the set: “insurance agent website” at KD 56, defended by national website vendors.
What about local insurance keywords?
Local patterns — “[city] insurance agent,” “medicare broker near me,” “[line] agent near me” — almost never show measurable volume, and this pull proves the pattern: 8 of the 79 keywords returned no volume at all, and even national channel terms like “ppc for insurance agents” sat below the floor. Local queries fragment across thousands of city and line combinations, so each variant measures at nothing while the aggregate is the highest-closing traffic an agent can get.
The terms that returned zero measurable volume in this pull:
| Keyword | Volume/mo | CPC | Difficulty | Intent |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ppc for insurance agents | 0 (below floor) | — | n/a — not measurable | navigational |
| medicare seminar marketing | 0 (below floor) | — | n/a — not measurable | informational |
| marketing for independent insurance agencies | 0 (below floor) | — | n/a — not measurable | commercial |
| landing pages for insurance agents | 0 (below floor) | — | n/a — not measurable | informational |
| how to get annuity leads | 0 (below floor) | — | n/a — not measurable | informational |
| how much do final expense leads cost | 0 (below floor) | — | n/a — not measurable | informational |
| final expense agent website | 0 (below floor) | — | n/a — not measurable | navigational |
| exclusive iul leads | 0 (below floor) | — | n/a — not measurable | navigational |
Source: DataForSEO Labs, July 2026 (US, English).
Do not let a volume tool talk you out of local pages. Zero measurable volume is a reporting artifact, not absent demand — the map pack, reviews, and location pages that win these searches are their own discipline, covered by our local SEO service for insurance agents.
How do you map insurance keywords to page types?
Match the page format to the keyword’s intent, not to where you’d prefer the content to live: transactional and commercial terms get service or offer pages, informational terms get guides that funnel to those pages, and navigational terms usually aren’t worth targeting at all. Google’s own advice in its SEO Starter Guide is to “think about the words that a user might search for to find a piece of your content” — the words in these tables are exactly that, measured.
| Intent | Build this | Example from the data |
|---|---|---|
| Transactional | Offer page or dedicated landing page | buy insurance leads (140/mo, KD 3) |
| Commercial | Service page or comparison post | seo for insurance agents (720/mo, $58.37 CPC) |
| Informational | Guide that funnels to a money page | how to get life insurance leads (170/mo) |
| Navigational | Usually skip — brand-owned results | insurance leads (1,900/mo) |
Which layer of SEO deserves your budget first is a strategy question — that’s covered in our complete guide to SEO for insurance agents. The build sequence once you’ve picked targets is in how to rank an insurance agency website on Google.
Which insurance keywords are rising, and which are dying?
The 12-month trends in this pull tell one coherent story: generic “hire a marketer” searches are collapsing while lead-source and channel-specific searches grow.
Steepest declines (12-month trend, same July 2026 pull):
- annuity leads for agents: −94%
- crm software for insurance agents: −82%
- digital marketing for insurance agents: −77%
- marketing consultant insurance: −76%
- website design for insurance agents: −72%
- seo for insurance agents: −45%
Biggest risers:
- insurance lead generation companies: +177%
- home insurance leads for agents: +100%
- exclusive mortgage protection leads: +100%
- life insurance leads for agents: +88%
- final expense direct mail leads: +57%
Our read: the declining searches aren’t disappearing demand — they’re demand migrating to ChatGPT, Perplexity, and AI Overviews, where nobody types “digital marketing for insurance agents” into a search box. That migration is why keyword targeting now has a second job: being the page an AI engine cites. We cover that discipline in how to get cited by Perplexity and AI Overviews.
How to use this list
- Pick your line first. An agent’s site should own one segment table above, not sample all eight. Depth in one line beats a scattering of pages across five.
- Sort by intent, not volume. Work the commercial and transactional rows first — they’re smaller and they pay. Navigational rows are vendor-owned; skip them.
- Use CPC as a value signal. A 70-search term at a $220 CPC is worth more than a 1,900-search term at $18. If advertisers pay that much per click, ranking for it organically is the arbitrage.
- Treat “n/a — not measurable” difficulty as unmeasured, never as easy. It usually means low competition, but confirm by looking at who actually ranks before committing a quarter of content to it.
- Build one page per cluster, then interlink. One strong page targeting “final expense direct mail leads” and its close variants beats five thin ones — and every informational page should hand traffic to a money page.
If you’d rather have operators run this data for you — targets picked for your line, pages built, rankings tracked against leads instead of vanity terms — that’s our insurance SEO program. Or start with a free marketing audit and we’ll map these keywords against what your site already ranks for.
- Insurance SEO Cost, Timeline, and the DIY-vs-Hire Decision
What insurance SEO costs in 2026, how long it takes to pay back, and whether to run it yourself or hire it out — with the four layers ranked by payback.
- How to Get More Google Reviews for Insurance Agents (Without Gaming It)
How to get more Google reviews for insurance agents: when to ask, the direct-link method, texting requests, responding to reviews, and staying compliant.
- How to Rank an Insurance Agency Website: The Insurance Agency SEO Guide
How to rank an insurance agency website on Google: a practitioner's SEO guide to technical setup, content, local signals, and the cadence that holds it.
- How to Get Cited by Perplexity and Google AI Overviews as a Local Business
How to get cited by Perplexity and Google AI Overviews as a local business: answer-first passages, structured data, consistent NAP, and third-party citations.